another analysis

this is an old airplane crash, but I read up on it because it recently made the news because of it was involved in a court decision. This year.b the accident has happened a long time ago.And it was a very automated airplane capable of flying itself.I think also capable of landing itself. It’s interesting, though how people they get this data, they get this information.They get this narrative.And they just jump to the conclusion that one of the pilots, or another of the pilots had no clue what they were doing. You’re just an armchair analyst, you’re just an armchair analyst. You were not there, you were not. You did not know what was happening to the plane. You surely didn’t design the software of the plane? And even though you have allowed a data and what happened with the plane as it climbed and then descended into the ocean, there’s a lot of things here that don’t make sense.I mean. I would not jump to the conclusion to blame the pilot.When they have on record the pilot saying, he has absolutely no control of the airplane. When a pilot says that when a pilot says he has no control of the airplane, that means he probably has no aliuron control. He probably has no effective stick control to move the airplane up or down. Nose up or nose down? He is literally just moving the stick, and it’s literally doing nothing that he wants.And this is what was happening.So to sit there and say that it was somehow the pilot’s fault when he was sitting in an airplane that literally he could not fly.Then, you know, I don’t know why people do this. It’s very interesting that the engines were going full throttle.This entire time as it descended from thirty five thousand feet.And impacted the ocean. It almost seems impossible for pilots to let this happen. But you have to remember the pilot said, verbatim, they have no control of the aircraft. So what, you know, people say that the auto pilot and disengaged, I you know, I don’t know. II does anyone absolutely know for absolute fact that the autopilot was not working. It almost seems like to me.It possibly was working, but it was in a very degraded state. Sure, there’s all this data that says this happened.And this happened and dead men tell no tales. It’s very easy to blame a dead pilot, a dead operator a dead soldier.It’s very easy, just go ahead and kill them.Accidentally, or otherwise, and then you can blame all sorts of things on them.Because there’s no 12 refute the evidence. And it’s extremely easy to create evidence that makes the person look guilty.That makes the person look like he did.The stupid thing it’s extremely easy to jump to conclusions when no one is there to tell you that that is not what happened. If you want to see some of these armchair, analysts go ahead and click the link below on reddit.

The Long Way Down: The crash of Air France flight 447 – revisited
byu/Admiral_Cloudberg inAdmiralCloudberg