another analysis

This is an old airplane crash, but I read up on it because it recently made the news because of it was involved in a court decision. Yes, this was a typical modern airliner that fly’s itself, which is an amazing thing yet I hear pilots speak of these things with doubt and anger of the computer making decisions. This nasty, deadly accident happened a long time ago. And it was a very automated airplane capable of flying itself. I think also capable of landing itself. It’s interesting, though how people they get this data, they get this information. They get this narrative. And they just jump to the conclusion that one of the pilots, or another of the pilots had no clue what they were doing. You’re just an armchair analyst, you’re just a nobody, a hypocritical armchair analyst. You were not there, you were not. You did not know what was happening to the plane. You surely didn’t design the software of the plane? And even though you have allowed a data and what happened with the plane as it climbed and then descended into the ocean, there’s a lot of things here that don’t make sense. I mean.

Lets jump to conclusions! I would not jump to the conclusion to blame the pilot. When they have on record the pilot saying, he said,

“I have, has absolutely no control of the airplane!”

When a pilot says that, when a pilot says he has no control of the airplane, that means he probably has no aileron control. He probably has no effective stick control to move the airplane up or down. Nose up or nose down? He is literally just moving the stick, and it’s literally doing nothing that he wants. And this is what was happening. So, to sit there and say that it was somehow the pilot’s fault when he was sitting in an airplane that literally he could not fly. Then, you know, I don’t know why people do this. It’s very interesting that the engines were going full throttle. This entire time as it descended from thirty-five thousand feet. And impacted the ocean. It almost seems impossible for pilots to let this happen. But you have to remember the pilot said, verbatim, they have no control of the aircraft. So what, you know, people say that the auto pilot and disengaged, I you know, I don’t know. II does anyone absolutely know for absolute fact that the autopilot was not working. It almost seems like to me, the autopilot possibly was working, but it was in a very degraded state. Sure, there’s all this data that says this happened. And this happened and dead men tell no tales.

The psychological margin of safety, perhaps call it PMOS. This way it comes as a safety margin, not a safe thing. Say, “your team needs to increase its psychological margin of safety, so that more people will comment on each project.” The worst example of this is military organizations, pick any country, go to their military projects. What do you see in those failing projects or those projects that are completely useless? You will see PMOS levels undetectable. No margin of safety can be seen regarding speaking up. Was there someone who spoke up about a problem with this airplane or the software or with the maintenance? Did he speak up? And maybe his voice was muted, because in that environment, it’s not safe to speak up. People who speak up getting trouble right?

I have a friend, retired pilot with thousands of hours of flight experience, I will ask him what he thinks, I will try to post his comments here. Ok, so my friend wrote back, and he was the one thing he said was that it was weird that the airplane did not have complementary aircraft controls, meaning like it wasn’t. You weren’t ever sure exactly who was flying the plane. And I think in some planes, when one set of controls moves to the right, the other set of controls moves to the right meaning they complement each other. And so it really, it doesn’t matter who’s flying the plane. If only one set of inputs that could be happening, whoever’s pushes the stick, the hardest wins. And I guess because of it’s a software controlled airplane.The controls are not complementary, is what he said. I wanna ask the pilot again, what he thinks about how exactly even though the controls did have that issue. It still seems bizarre to me that the plane could have dropped that fast into the ocean, with the pilots trying to fly the plane. It really makes me think that qatar pilots could not fly the plane at all.There was something horribly wrong with the aircraft that left them with no way to control the aircraft

Photo by Jonathan Borba on Pexels.com

It’s very easy to blame a dead pilot, a dead operator a dead soldier. It’s very easy, just go ahead and kill them.Accidentally, or otherwise, and then you can blame all sorts of things on them. Because there’s no way to refute the narrative. No one is alive to tell you what they felt, what they heard, what they experienced And it’s extremely easy to create evidence that makes the person look guilty. That makes the person look like he did this. The stupid thing it’s extremely easy to jump to conclusions when no one is there to tell you that that is not what happened. If you want to see some of these armchair analysts, go ahead and click the link below on reddit.

Copyright 2026 Rod Deluhery

Leave a comment