What do you think of marriage? Yeah, I think that the central part of the matter, the central part of the matter is what people think. Call it culture, the known ideas about marriage that vary by geography or religion. Marriage is, and it is usually a very strong thing that is supposed to override all other quarrels, so that you stay married. and so yes, I will be comparing here, I am saying it doesn’t matter who you get married to you. There is the assumption you will. You will try everything you can do to make the marriage work at almost any cost. this is something that this whole concept it is very, it’s a thing. It’s a thing, it’s a good thing. Sometimes it’s a good thing. Sometimes good, but being married, but it could be very stressful. No matter who you’re married to, because of these assumptions that you have been placed in this relationship. And that you’re going to do any almost anything. It takes meaning, you will be unhappy for a little bit. That’s okay, you will. You will be unhappy for a long time. That’s okay. You will be unhappy again for a short period of time. That’s okay as long as it is for the relationship. This is the part, the part that is bothersome. That is very, very questionable to me. and this comes up with any person.
throughout history and I think through most cultures, marriage is for the woman. It’s supposed to be for both.But primarily it’s for the woman’s comfort. This is a fact.
Ok, it is not a fact. But this is my take on it. And I i’m sure there are other opinions.
I hate facts that are not scientific testable facts. Here is a non fact that AI gave me today:
A cosmic fact that bends the mind
The universe has a “cosmic speed limit” — the speed of light — but space itself can expand faster than that.
Meaning: There are galaxies moving away from us so fast that their light will never reach Earth, not even in infinite time.
They’re not just far. They’re permanently unreachable — entire regions of the universe we will never observe, never measure, never know.
Most of reality is, by definition, forever hidden.
That is a fact? For one, it is the first time I have ever heard this new fact. How many astronomers believe this is fact, versus believe it is a theory? I have heard something like this, regarding jets of material shooting across space that appear to possibly be going near the speed of light. Appear. Then I have heard of simulations of the cosmos. A simulation to me is not a scientific fact. A biology teacher I had this year tried to tell the students that self replicating molecules are a fact. The professor called them “abiotic self replicating molecules”. When I asked for reference, she gave me a document that described self replicating molecules in a SIMULATION. No experiments, no proof. How is a simulation a fact? The evidence for this fact, the professor gave me this article regarding the simulations (of self replicating molecules). To me, not fact.
Imagine what you will about or galaxy, look at great star photos here and use your imagination. Just don’t call it a fact, something you took a picture of and decided the star was exactly composed of these materials (spectroscopy). Another stupid fact that I hate reading about, how we KNOW stars are exactly made of THESE materials. We have a pretty good idea, but it is not a fact. See some stars:
Image Archive: Stars |ESA/Webb
crypto_voyage 