Facts about marriage

What do you think of marriage? Yeah, I think that the central part of the matter, the central part of the matter is what people think. Call it culture, the known ideas about marriage that vary by geography or religion. Marriage is, and it is usually a very strong thing that is supposed to override all other quarrels, so that you stay married. and so yes, I will be comparing here, I am saying it doesn’t matter who you get married to you. There is the assumption you will. You will try everything you can do to make the marriage work at almost any cost. this is something that this whole concept it is very, it’s a thing. It’s a thing, it’s a good thing. Sometimes it’s a good thing. Sometimes good, but being married, but it could be very stressful. No matter who you’re married to, because of these assumptions that you have been placed in this relationship. And that you’re going to do any almost anything. It takes meaning, you will be unhappy for a little bit. That’s okay, you will. You will be unhappy for a long time. That’s okay. You will be unhappy again for a short period of time. That’s okay as long as it is for the relationship. This is the part, the part that is bothersome. That is very, very questionable to me. and this comes up with any person.

throughout history and I think through most cultures, marriage is for the woman. It’s supposed to be for both.But primarily it’s for the woman’s comfort. This is a fact.

Ok, it is not a fact. But this is my take on it. And I i’m sure there are other opinions.

Photo by Thilina Alagiyawanna on Pexels.com

I hate facts that are not scientific testable facts. Here is a non fact that AI gave me today:

A cosmic fact that bends the mind

The universe has a “cosmic speed limit” — the speed of light — but space itself can expand faster than that.

Meaning: There are galaxies moving away from us so fast that their light will never reach Earth, not even in infinite time.

They’re not just far. They’re permanently unreachable — entire regions of the universe we will never observe, never measure, never know.

Most of reality is, by definition, forever hidden.

That is a fact? For one, it is the first time I have ever heard this new fact. How many astronomers believe this is fact, versus believe it is a theory? I have heard something like this, regarding jets of material shooting across space that appear to possibly be going near the speed of light. Appear. Then I have heard of simulations of the cosmos. A simulation to me is not a scientific fact. A biology teacher I had this year tried to tell the students that self replicating molecules are a fact. The professor called them “abiotic self replicating molecules”. When I asked for reference, she gave me a document that described self replicating molecules in a SIMULATION. No experiments, no proof. How is a simulation a fact? The evidence for this fact, the professor gave me this article regarding the simulations (of self replicating molecules). To me, not fact.

Imagine what you will about or galaxy, look at great star photos here and use your imagination. Just don’t call it a fact, something you took a picture of and decided the star was exactly composed of these materials (spectroscopy). Another stupid fact that I hate reading about, how we KNOW stars are exactly made of THESE materials. We have a pretty good idea, but it is not a fact. See some stars:

Image Archive: Stars |ESA/Webb

The cluster measures between 6 light-years and 13 light-years across, and is host to some of our Milky Way galaxy’s hottest, brightest, and most massive stars.

navy plane, marine avaitor

At the store, a pilot of one of these old planes was walking into the store. He was pretty frail. I had to help him up the steps. And then I also had, I’ll hold the door for him, because he looked like he just wasn’t very strong. He was a marine corp, aviator flying a navy plane is what he told me.

i love talking to anybody that was on a ship. I was on the uss anchorage for 4 years.

here are some pictures, some of them are really old.Some of them are newer after 1990. I was assigned to the ship around 1990 and around around exactly that time, they installed the ciws weapons, installed in long Beach naval base? I believe but I could be wrong and it could have been san diego, but I believe it was long beach where the ciws was installed. Around that time, I think shortly after they removed the three inch guns, which I think was a big mistake.I love the three inch guns.

USS Anchorage (LSD-36) underway at sea off Pascagoula, Mississippi, while running trials on 27 January 1969. Official U.S. Navy Photograph, from the collections of the Naval History and Heritage Command.

why do you need three inch guns? It’s called, carry a big stick and walk tall. The three inch guns were very visually impressive.If you saw the three inch gun shooting and you were anywhere near it.You would be worried. The kinetic power of the three inch projectile is no joke. I saw them fire many times I never saw them fire at night.But I can guarantee you.The fireball is this big.Here’s a picture of the fireball at night from the three inch gun. The navy’s shirking away from guns is ridiculous. They are the most cost, effective way of delivering destructive power over the ocean or over land that’s why the army still uses artillery. Do you see the army getting rid of artillery?No, so why did the navy get rid of artillery?I have no idea.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vought_F-8_Crusader

Public entity, UCI Health?

I ask you, dear reader, what comes to mind when you think of a government public entity? You might think of a government public entity like the Internal Revenue Service. A government group made to enforce and take a portion of your earnings. You also might think of your local police organization as government public entity. The Coast Guard, the guys who write you a ticket for not having a floatation device on your boat, yes I think of the Coast Guard as a public entity.

I like to simply concepts, so let’s try to look at a simple service, like a drinking faucet (for the public). In a perfect world with simple services let’s break down what a public entity may or may not be. I think of a public entity as a water faucet at a park. A water faucet at a park is free for anyone to use. Let’s table the qualities of a simple service public entity, provided by the government:

Water faucet at public park

PUBLIC ENTITY QUALITIES:
Free to use. Free, or in reality, very low cost.
Paid for by all users of the locale, in some taxes, like property taxes.
Anyone can use it at any time.
No service levels, no bias on who can use, because it is free of charge.

This is a simple service, a water faucet, at a park. It is free, and universal service, obvious somehow paid by the government. And we see it is free, it is open to the public with no bias towards your income. Anyone can come and get a free drink of water. How amazing! The service is not in reality free, but the cost to the public is so low, no one would notice. I think most readers would think that this is a great deal and a great public entity. It is a great service, this water faucet.

Now lets get complicated and think of more massive entities and what a tangle of qualities they have, and how many questions arise on how some of these groups are considered public entities.

I worked for a short period of time at a work-place, I had a job there, a place some called a public entity, a group called “UCI Health”. This group was part of the Regents of the University of California. The regents and their organization was formed for state educational purposes. Many years later, University of California Irvine was formed, then years later, UCI Health. So you may ask, who considers this a public entity? Well, the author, myself, I sued UCI Health for a few items, after I left employment with them. And one of the first things the contracted lawyers for UCI Health mention is that they are a public entity and can not be sued for certain things. While writing motions for the lawsuit, and thinking critically as the plaintiff, asked the judge to consider that this was not the case, and I provided evidence. The judge considered that and decided that he believed it also was a public entity. More on that later. For now, let me explain why I think UCI Health, like many other large organizations, is not a public entity.

UCI Health

PUBLIC ENTITY QUALITIES:

I know of none.

Yes, that is right. I don’t know of anything at UCI Health that meets the qualities of a public entity. What I do know is that there are many qualities that match a business. Lets go through some of them.

UCI Health

QUALITIES MATCHING A BUSINESS OR CORPORATION:

Not free.
Not low cost, actually has services that cost more than other commodity providers.
Paid for by a conglomeration of funding sources as to be almost impossible to understand who is paying the bills for this organization. Historically has been funded by tax payer dollars, but that is no longer the case. Only now partially paid by tax money.
Anyone can NOT use it, unless you want to pay the higher than usual fees for health care.
Has outdoor and online advertising promoting the service (that costs money and makes the service less affordable)
Has offices and clinics in neighborhoods catering to the rich, with lavish décor and buildings. Usually put in neighborhoods with high capital income.

So you can see, for me, this is just wrong. To say that these large organizations, many which have outgrown their original governmental assigned structure, should not, I repeat, should NEVER be given such gold status, the seal as a government public entity. My court case continues, and at some point, I hope to convince the courts that it is wrong to assign these organizations as public entity. Giving public entity status means the group gets sovereign immunity BECAUSE IT IS IN FACT THE government. It is old english law, and it makes sense in many instances. The government is for the people and can afford to be sued, but should not be sued for certain items. . . some of that makes sense. But the organization needs to be for the people, for everyone, and NOT, I repeat, NOT designed for PROFIT above all else. This is what I saw when I worked for UCI Health, and organization built to maintain itself, make profit from the upper class, NOT maintain the people and certainly NOT for the community as a whole. This I think is a fact, a fact I have seen, when in fact, UCI HEALTH, appears to function and operate NOTHING LIKE THE GOVERNMENT.

Under U.S. law, a public entity is any state or local government body, department, agency, or instrumentality created, funded, or controlled by government to carry out governmental functions.

You can read more about the regents at the link below.

Regents of the University of California — Grokipedia

innovate

By Rod Deluhery
Invent. Analyze. Document. Never stop. My ability is to solve problems and create value. What I have that others do not have is a knowledge of the patent process and ability to get the patent.

Innovation killers.
Things that stop innovation. A common innovator will get the feedback, no one cares about his idea. Or the sound of silence, lack of any feedback makes the innovator think that no one cares about the idea. What to do? Don’t give up.
I suggest keep talking until you get more information. I did this recently and found that I should be able to demonstrate the concept to the leaders. Really? I didn’t know that would be necessary with a idea that I came up with. In this organization, yes, they want to see the demonstration. For me I can provide a demonstration, in a limited way. More work for me to polish the demonstration.

If you need to demonstration of your idea or your process, you might want to think about the technology readiness level. This is from the united states government from nasa, they have a thing called the TRL level. For my invention, I am somewhere between t r l level one and t r l level two. I have a basic proof of concept but it does not address all the goals of the idea. Read below to understand more about the technology readiness levels.

Technology Readiness Levels

Be aware of common problems with innovation. Here are some innovation rules of thumb. Review these as you work on your idea and demonstration.

Know these and be aware of these innovation killers:

Implementation Friction. It’s just too complicated!
Proprietary (corporate intellectual property) stumbling blocks. Focusing on how intellectual property will make this improbable or impossible.
It’s not a quick win.
Too obscure. The idea, it doesn’t solve any existing problems, so let’s ignore for now.
Working on a solution or idea but not spending time on how to demonstrate the concept to stakeholders.
Working on a solution or idea, but not spending equivalent time on how to get creative work arounds to items in items 1-5 listed above.

Innovation paradoxes. Innovation applied will create unexpected results. The expected result may not be as expected and totally unexpected process may emerge. What paradoxes will artificial intelligence create? I keep thinking, when will school children be told to use the ai consultant whenever they are need help? I can think of an AI Agent that could help many people like with gambling habits. But what other effects will it create?

Some history, to illustrate. The Jevons Paradox is an economic principle stating that as technological advancements increase the efficiency of resource use, total consumption of that resource often rises rather than falls. Because efficiency lowers per-unit costs, it unlocks new demand and makes previously unviable projects economically feasible.

Proposed by English economist William Stanley Jevons in his 1865 book The Coal Question. He observed that James Watt’s improved, highly efficient steam engines didn’t reduce coal consumption as many expected; instead, it made coal-powered production so cheap and widespread that total coal use skyrocketed.

Someone told me once that a long time ago, when nuclear power was just coming online, that it was going to make electricity free. There was actually thought that it may be free to give away electricity in the future. Because nuclear power made electrical generations so cost effective. And so such a low cost that it may become free. So low cost that it may even be free. Obviously that didn’t happen. And obviously they didn’t really think about the long term costs involved of disposal of the nuclear fuel. And I believe that still the case that in the united states, there is no long term storage of nuclear fuel. That cost is still going to be added to the price of electricity as they continue to figure out where to store used nuclear fuel in the long term.

pricelesd

priceless

Did you say it was 60 years old? And still new in the box.? Yes, over sixty years old and still new in the box never been used still wrapped up. This is a manufactured item that is pretty much now, priceless,

I think of myself as pretty knowledgeable with antiques, and I would say, a manufactured good that is over 60 years old and is still in the box still sealed in the box. Some kind of wrapping, some kind of sealing never been opened before at all. I would say those antiques are pretty much priceless. Pretty much anything that old is extremely extremely rare to find new in the box. Pricing, it is going to be difficult because the only thing you can compare it to is one that is open. So what do you do? So do you say because it’s sealed that it’s worth four times the price of one?That’s open, or do you say do you say?Maybe no, it’s worth ten times the price of one that’s open? Completely arbitrary pricing. Because it’s priceless.

It becomes priceless, because there is no way you’re finding another one.Anywhere, it’s going to take you years of searching to find another one. And you may never actually find another one that anyone wants to sell you.So that is the point that it becomes a manufactured item becomes priceless. My opinion.

i have this item if you’re interested leave a comment.If you want to buy it. We could do the transaction through ebay.And yes, it is sealed.And is completely new in the box.Never been opened. Hs-16a headphones.

Redacted

it’s really not free speech if you have to remove certain words from your discussion now is it ?? And you can see, as the government tries to push these laws down, the people get more upset and they come to protest. Just because the government is trying to silence the speech. This is history repeating, and often it gets bloody. The government tries to quietly prevent the people from speaking. More people understand this, they have feelings that they are being suppressed.Their ideas and emotions and thoughts are being suppressed.And even more people come out to protest. The government refuses to back down, and eventually the protests get so large that they become violent. This may take months this may take years, but it will happen is my guess. These attempts at redacting speech usually don’t end very well. There are exceptions and we know that in china and other countries, you have no freedom of speech. It’s not just that you can’t say certain words.There’s hundreds and hundreds of things you cannot say in Chima.

end of watch

so this criminal gets a forty year sentence. So that’s 4 decades. He was supposed to serve 4 decades in jail. For his felonies, instead, somehow he gets out after less than a year and kills this police officer. What’s wrong with our system that we can’t keep people in jail, but yet we’re building jails. For immigrants? Wow.

i was recently pulled over because my tags have been taken off by somebody. Car is registered correctly, but no tags. My guess is the officer didn’t run the plate. He just pulled me over because he wanted to. Three policemen surrounded my car and wanted to look in through my windows and ask me to roll down my window.So they could see inside my car, so they could see better inside my car. I did everything the officers wanted, including rolling down my windows. It’s a little disturbing getting interrogated by police officers. But the thing you have to remember is there’s all these criminals out on the streets. Because the system is broken and they do not serve their time, and they’re full on criminals.And they will kill you. So even though I want to write the local police department and tell them, could they be a little bit less rude? And a little bit less intrusive on a simple pull over? It just disturbs me but i’m not going to write the letter to my local police because I understand it’s really dangerous being a police officer.

Around 9:26 p.m., the Carroll County Sheriff’s Office received a call for a welfare check. When Deputy Utt and another deputy arrived at the scene, the subject fired at both deputies before fleeing.

Deputy Utt was killed. The other deputy was struck in his ballistic vest and received medical treatment.

The suspect was arrested two days later in North Carolina. He has been charged with murder. The suspect, a convicted felon, was convicted of eight felony charges in 2015, but only served eight months of the 40-year sentence.

Deputy Utt was a United States Air Force veteran and had served with the Carroll County Sheriff’s Office for over two years. H

https://www.odmp.org/officer/27819-deputy-sheriff-logan-reece-utt

another analysis

This is an old airplane crash, but I read up on it because it recently made the news because of it was involved in a court decision. Yes, this was a typical modern airliner that fly’s itself, which is an amazing thing yet I hear pilots speak of these things with doubt and anger of the computer making decisions. This nasty, deadly accident happened a long time ago. And it was a very automated airplane capable of flying itself. I think also capable of landing itself. It’s interesting, though how people they get this data, they get this information. They get this narrative. And they just jump to the conclusion that one of the pilots, or another of the pilots had no clue what they were doing. You’re just an armchair analyst, you’re just a nobody, a hypocritical armchair analyst. You were not there, you were not. You did not know what was happening to the plane. You surely didn’t design the software of the plane? And even though you have allowed a data and what happened with the plane as it climbed and then descended into the ocean, there’s a lot of things here that don’t make sense. I mean.

Lets jump to conclusions! I would not jump to the conclusion to blame the pilot. When they have on record the pilot saying, he said,

“I have, has absolutely no control of the airplane!”

When a pilot says that, when a pilot says he has no control of the airplane, that means he probably has no aileron control. He probably has no effective stick control to move the airplane up or down. Nose up or nose down? He is literally just moving the stick, and it’s literally doing nothing that he wants. And this is what was happening. So, to sit there and say that it was somehow the pilot’s fault when he was sitting in an airplane that literally he could not fly. Then, you know, I don’t know why people do this. It’s very interesting that the engines were going full throttle. This entire time as it descended from thirty-five thousand feet. And impacted the ocean. It almost seems impossible for pilots to let this happen. But you have to remember the pilot said, verbatim, they have no control of the aircraft. So what, you know, people say that the auto pilot and disengaged, I you know, I don’t know. II does anyone absolutely know for absolute fact that the autopilot was not working. It almost seems like to me, the autopilot possibly was working, but it was in a very degraded state. Sure, there’s all this data that says this happened. And this happened and dead men tell no tales.

The psychological margin of safety, perhaps call it PMOS. This way it comes as a safety margin, not a safe thing. Say, “your team needs to increase its psychological margin of safety, so that more people will comment on each project.” The worst example of this is military organizations, pick any country, go to their military projects. What do you see in those failing projects or those projects that are completely useless? You will see PMOS levels undetectable. No margin of safety can be seen regarding speaking up. Was there someone who spoke up about a problem with this airplane or the software or with the maintenance? Did he speak up? And maybe his voice was muted, because in that environment, it’s not safe to speak up. People who speak up getting trouble right?

I have a friend, retired pilot with thousands of hours of flight experience, I will ask him what he thinks, I will try to post his comments here. Ok, so my friend wrote back, and he was the one thing he said was that it was weird that the airplane did not have complementary aircraft controls, meaning like it wasn’t. You weren’t ever sure exactly who was flying the plane. And I think in some planes, when one set of controls moves to the right, the other set of controls moves to the right meaning they complement each other. And so it really, it doesn’t matter who’s flying the plane. If only one set of inputs that could be happening, whoever’s pushes the stick, the hardest wins. And I guess because of it’s a software controlled airplane.The controls are not complementary, is what he said. I wanna ask the pilot again, what he thinks about how exactly even though the controls did have that issue. It still seems bizarre to me that the plane could have dropped that fast into the ocean, with the pilots trying to fly the plane. It really makes me think that qatar pilots could not fly the plane at all.There was something horribly wrong with the aircraft that left them with no way to control the aircraft

It’s very easy to blame a dead pilot, a dead operator a dead soldier. It’s very easy, just go ahead and kill them.Accidentally, or otherwise, and then you can blame all sorts of things on them. Because there’s no way to refute the narrative. No one is alive to tell you what they felt, what they heard, what they experienced And it’s extremely easy to create evidence that makes the person look guilty. That makes the person look like he did this. The stupid thing it’s extremely easy to jump to conclusions when no one is there to tell you that that is not what happened. If you want to see some of these armchair analysts, go ahead and click the link below on reddit.

The Long Way Down: The crash of Air France flight 447 – revisited
byu/Admiral_Cloudberg inAdmiralCloudberg

sad song

https://pandora.app.link/BEYU6ItLY3b

Just the way you are. A song to weep, a song to celebrate life lost.

That’s pretty sad. We a lot of us come out here to this desert. And it’s dry and it’s hot and we just do our job. They do some dangerous things here, i’m super sad for the families. Nothing good, nothing good, except maybe we all think a little bit more, that out time is limited. We all have limited amount of time and be nice and be happy. We will be better? And for the 6 air force guys. Well you guys are forever flyers. Rest in peace.

Pray in all circumstances.

To the families of the 8 aviators lost at Edwards Air Force Base. B52 crash.

authority authoritarianism

I don’t know what you call it. But I think it’s, it’s when you look up the definition of facism, yes this is it is ultra nationalism, the uk is so concerned about who their friends are that they are putting people in jail simply because they’re telling people that they are creating the war crime. They are just protesting, but this is what it comes to when governments control everything you want to do. This is life without free speech.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1013791284404936/?mibextid=9drbnH&s=yWDuG2&fs=e

crypto_voyage